Similar Cases
Based on: OS NO. 192/ 2018 — Case between Devakumar vs Asokan et al regarding impleading an additional defendant.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit No. 433/ 2019
Case between Sainulabdeen vs Sajeer regarding balance court fee
The case involves the plaintiff Sainulabdeen and defendant Sajeer regarding the remittance of balance court fees. The court found that the plaintiff failed to remit the fee despite multiple opportunities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 453/2024
Case between Vijayakumari vs Induslnd Bank regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Vijayakumari and Prakash, are husband and wife who filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Induslnd Bank. They seek to prevent the bank from forcefully taking possession of their autorickshaw due to loan repayment demands.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 158/ 2018
Case between Shibu vs Ajeesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The petitioner, Shibu, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents from trespassing into a pathway essential for accessing his property. The respondents deny the existence of this pathway and object to the amendment of the plaint.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1280/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, sued the defendants, Jayan. E and Saleela, for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to the suit for realization of the owed sum.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1963/2015
Case between State Bank of Travancore et al vs M/s Talipot Technology Solutions Ltd. et al regarding court fee remittance
The case involves the State Bank of Travancore and M/s Talipot Technology Solutions Ltd. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit the required court fee despite several opportunities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1379/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh Kumar.G regarding realization of money
Canara Bank is suing Rajesh Kumar.G for repayment of a loan that was taken for purchasing an autorickshaw. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayments despite the bank's repeated requests.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.846/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs Sheeja.N regarding realisation of money
Canara Bank filed a suit against Sheeja.N for the recovery of a loan amount due to default in repayment. The court found that the bank had established its case for recovery.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1037/2015
Case between State Bank of Travancore vs Remonykumar regarding realisation of money
The State Bank of Travancore is suing Remonykumar for the non-repayment of multiple gold loans. The defendant defaulted on the loans despite repeated requests to make payments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.447/2024
Case between Sankaranarayanan.U vs Sandeep.M.S et al regarding realisation of money
Sankaranarayanan.U filed a petition against Sandeep.M.S, Sindhulekha, and Smitha regarding the realization of a loan amount secured by a mortgage on property. The petitioner claims that the respondents are trying to alienate the property despite the mortgage agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1933/2019
Case between M/s.Saj Distributors et al vs M/s.Bharti Airtel Limited et al regarding arbitration of a dispute
The plaintiffs, M/s.Saj Distributors, filed a suit against the defendants, M/s.Bharti Airtel Limited, seeking to recover an amount based on a distributor agreement. The defendants sought to refer the dispute to arbitration, claiming the agreement contained an arbitration clause.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.349/2021
Case between Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Joseph et al regarding realisation of money.
The case involves Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited suing Joseph and Joseph Sharon for failure to repay a loan. The defendants were absent, and the court awarded the plaintiff a decree for the amount due.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.778/2022
Case between Jasmine vs V.S. Geetha et al regarding recovery of money and other consequential reliefs.
The plaintiff, Jasmine, filed a suit against the defendants, V.S. Geetha and others, for recovery of money after they failed to convert property from paddy field to dry land as per their agreement. The suit claims for return of an advance sale consideration with interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.352/2023
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Dhanya.U.M Kumar et al regarding realisation of money
The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff seeking to restore a dismissed application related to a money recovery suit. The defendants have objected to the application, citing negligence in taking steps for representation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1036/2020
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Krishna Prasad.A.S. et al regarding realisation of money.
The case involves the Punjab National Bank suing Krishna Prasad.A.S. and others for the repayment of an education loan amounting to Rs.3,35,965/-. The defendants defaulted on their loan repayments, leading to legal action by the bank.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1800/2024
Case between M/S Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Shajahan et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, M/S Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited, provided a loan to the first defendant for purchasing a scooter, which was guaranteed by the other defendants. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading to this legal action for recovery.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1725/2023
Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Udheesh Kumar P.U et al regarding realisation of money.
M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. is the plaintiff in a suit for the realisation of a loan amount from the defendants. The defendants failed to repay the loan taken for purchasing a two-wheeler, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.770/2025
Case between State Bank of India vs Summer Travels regarding plaint rejection.
The State Bank of India, represented by its manager, filed a suit against Summer Travels. The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1379/2016
Case between Antony Prince vs HDFC Bank Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves a dispute between Antony Prince and HDFC Bank Ltd regarding a loan for a vehicle. The plaintiff seeks an injunction to prevent the bank from taking possession of the vehicle due to alleged defaults in payment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1344/2018
Case between Blassy Cambus vs P.Ancil regarding realization of money
Blassy Cambus is the plaintiff seeking recovery of Rs.2,57,030/- from P.Ancil, the defendant, who allegedly borrowed money under the assurance of repayment. The defendant has denied the allegations, claiming the money was related to construction for the plaintiff's brother.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 24/2024
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
Babu Rajan N. and Raveendran Pillai are suing the Government of Kerala for a declaration of civil death of their brother, Mr. Rajendran N., who has been missing for 28 years. They require this declaration to facilitate obtaining a legal heirship certificate to pledge their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.41/2025
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
Sheena, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Anvar and Ramabhadran to stop an illegal chicken stall operating in a shop room owned by Ramabhadran. The plaintiff alleges threats and illegal constructions facilitated by Anvar.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 117/2021
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
The case involves The Federal Bank, Ltd represented by its Manager against defendants Siyad. S and Haseena Beevi. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
The petitioners, children of the deceased Solomon Cruz, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property purchased by their father, while the defendants claim rights over a portion of the property. The case involves disputes over property tax and land boundaries.
Civil Suit
OS No. 361/2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
Sunitha, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant, to prevent alleged encroachment on her property. The dispute arises from a badminton court construction agreement and ownership claims over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 361/ 2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction
Sunitha, the plaintiff, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant. The case involves a dispute over property rights and the construction of a badminton court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 43/2025
Case between Nithin Krishna vs Gireesh et al regarding suit dismissal
Nithin Krishna is the plaintiff, and Gireesh along with others are the defendants in this case. The plaintiff filed a memo of not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 229/22021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The plaintiffs, Ayisha Beevi and her son Navas, are seeking to prevent the defendants, Noushad and Shajahan, from alienating a property. The court has issued an interim order to maintain the status quo until a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 219/ 2024
Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Resmi, the petitioner, is seeking a temporary injunction against her father Sureshkumar and his siblings, who are allegedly trying to alienate property against her father's interest. The petitioner claims her father is vulnerable due to his health conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 14/2022
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
The plaintiffs are the close relatives of Mr. Suresh Babu, who has been missing since 15.08.1990. They seek a declaration of his civil death to facilitate legal proceedings regarding his estate.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 79/2025
Case between Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust et al vs Raju et al regarding election to the director board of first petitioner trust
This case involves a petition by Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust and others against Raju and others regarding preventing the election to the director board of the trust. The defendants were restrained from interfering with the election process until the suit is disposed of.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 179/2024
Case between Nahas vs Sabansa et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Nahas filed a suit against Sabansa and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the petitioner’s counsel submitted a memo indicating no further pursuit of the action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 340/2024
Case between Mahesh Lal vs Salimkuty et al regarding dismissal of the suit.
Mahesh Lal filed a suit against Salimkuty and Sachin S. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 137/2025
Case between Reenamony vs Remany, Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju regarding injunction
Reenamony is the petitioner seeking protection against the defendants Remany and Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju. The case involves a request for an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
The plaintiffs are seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from constructing on a property that the plaintiffs claim. The dispute involves allegations of encroachment and ownership over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Shobhana et al regarding IA. 01/2024
The petitioners, including Sarasamma, Prasobha, and Velayudhan, are involved in a case against the respondents, Shobhana and Pradeep, regarding an interim application. The court has allowed the petition and appointed an advocate commissioner for inspection.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.136/2025
Case between Vijayamma vs Anu et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Vijayamma filed a petition seeking an ad-interim injunction against Anu and others. The court found that failure to grant the injunction could cause irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 132/ 2025
Case between Kannan vs Anoob. V.R. regarding injunction
Kannan is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Anoob. V.R. The court determined that granting the injunction is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 131/2025
Case between R. Snehalatha vs Sarachandra Babu regarding injunction
R. Snehalatha filed a petition against Sarachandra Babu seeking an injunction to prevent interference with her water access. The court determined that granting the injunction was necessary to avoid irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 127/2025
Case between Abhijith et al vs Mohandas regarding injunction against encroachment
The petitioners, Abhijith and Jalajakumari Amma, are seeking an injunction against the defendant, Mohandas, regarding the encroachment of property. The court found that failure to grant the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the petitioners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 157/2020
Case between Thajuneesa vs Mohammad fanab et al regarding petition for legal heirship
The case involves a petition filed by Roshida regarding legal heirship of the deceased plaintiff Thajuneesa. The court found that Roshida is not the sole legal heir and dismissed the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 224/2022
Case between Sunil Kumar Narayanan et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sunil Kumar Narayanan and Manju Narayanan, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other authorities for a permanent prohibitory injunction. They contested the government's acquisition of their property without proper measurement and valuation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 120/ 2025
Case between Balachandran et al vs Sajith et al regarding ad-interim injunction
The petitioners, Balachandran and others, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the respondents, Sajith and others, to prevent encroachment on their property. The court has found prima facie evidence indicating that irreparable injury may occur without the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 483/ 2024
Case between Sajitha. M. vs Sasi et al regarding temporary injunction.
Sajitha M. filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Sasi and others to prevent them from encroaching on property and controlling a family temple. The defendants claimed to be the temple protection committee and argued they had rightful control.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.106/2025
Case between Subhash et al vs Binu et al regarding interim injunction
The plaintiffs, Subhash, Shyni, Soni, and Mini, are seeking an interim injunction against the defendants, Binu and Nadarajan, to prevent obstruction of access to their property. The court found a prima facie case for granting the injunction to avoid irreparable injury.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 354/2019
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs Rajendran, Prasanna, and Ammini filed a suit against M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited and Sanoj. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no steps taken to adduce evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 354/2019
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default
This case involves plaintiffs Rajendran, Prasanna, and Ammini against defendants M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited and Sanoj. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and no evidence being presented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 433/2019
Case between Sainulabdeen vs Sajeer regarding rejection of suit due to non-payment of court fees.
Sainulabdeen is the plaintiff, and Sajeer is the defendant. The case revolves around the rejection of the plaintiff's suit due to non-payment of the necessary court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 236/2018
Case between Sameer vs Laboodha Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sameer, the plaintiff, has filed a suit against Laboodha Beevi and others regarding a fixed deposit amount of 8,00,000/- in the Thiruvananthapuram District Co-operative Bank. The case concerns the refusal of the defendants to allot Sameer's rightful share of the deposit after the death of their father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won