Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1379/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh Kumar.G regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-01-09
Duration
approximately-1 year 23 days
Case Code No.
1379
Case Closed
Thu, 01/09/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is suing Rajesh Kumar.G for repayment of a loan that was taken for purchasing an autorickshaw. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayments despite the bank's repeated requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed with costs, and the defendant is ordered to pay an amount of Rs. 2,68,808/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay an amount of Rs. 2,68,808/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed with costs, and the defendant is ordered to pay an amount of Rs. 2,68,808/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and defendant shall pay an amount of Rs. 2,68,808/- (Rupees Two lakhs Sixty Eight thousand Eight hundred and Eight only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh Kumar.G
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan Application, Deed of Hypothecation Re: Vehicles, Copy of Statement of Loan Account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanth.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover the outstanding loan amount from the defendant.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is liable to decreed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application dated 08.12.2014 submitted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Deed of hypothecation for vehicles executed on 08.12.2014 to secure the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Loan Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the statement of loan account dated 02.09.2022 showing outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 12/08/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 01/09/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Summer Travels regarding plaint rejection.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Punjab National Bank vs Krishna Prasad.A.S. et al regarding realisation of money.
Court of Additional Munsiff-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Sheeja. N regarding plaint rejection
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won