OS.No.770/2025

Case between State Bank of India vs Summer Travels regarding plaint rejection.

Court

COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF

Judge

Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S

Order Date

2025-10-15

Duration

Case Code No.

770

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The State Bank of India, represented by its manager, filed a suit against Summer Travels. The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the necessary court fees.

Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected based on order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-payment of court fees.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected based on order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-payment of court fees.

Supporting Evidence

The plaint was rejected based on order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: State Bank of India
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Summer Travels
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Akhil
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K.P. Jayaraj
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Plaintiff's plaint was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.

Evidence:

No balance court fee seen paid till date. Hence, the plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification