Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1 - 5 of 4230

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Parathoduvil Aboobacker vs Parathoduvil Kunhimuhammed's children regarding partition

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 65 OF 2014

2017-02-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Musthafa vs et al regarding Property Dispute

Civil Procedure

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 327 OF 2014

TIRUR

2019-01-31

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Komban thodiyil Viswanthan vs K.T. sarada et al regarding Decree

Unknown

EP 240/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-01-31

0 years 2 months 28 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Subaida vs Ayisa Beevi et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 262 OF 1999

Tirur

2017-02-10

7 years 2 months 13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Asir. M vs Rashid. P.P regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:89/2017

Tirur

2019-01-25

Unknown

View Full Details

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
…
Next page
Last page

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,230 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 123 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 99 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 78 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1787
Defendant Won: 1257

1257

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

21%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to support the claims resulted in dismissals for multiple plaintiffs.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Many plaintiffs did not take required actions, such as issuing notices, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

The absence of plaintiffs at hearings frequently led to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?