Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No.136/2025

Case between Vijayamma vs Anu et al regarding ad-interim injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri.ARAVIND.P
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vijayamma filed a petition seeking an ad-interim injunction against Anu and others. The court found that failure to grant the injunction could cause irreparable injury to the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction preventing the defendants from encroaching upon the petitioner's property and from widening a pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction preventing the defendants from encroaching upon the petitioner's property and from widening a pathway.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case established and potential for irreparable injury.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondent is restrained from, encroaching into petition ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ schedule property and restrained from committing any act of waste therein and further restrained from widening the petition ‘D’ schedule pathway until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayamma
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anu
Party Age
36
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shine
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaijan@Kunjumon
Party Age
53
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sandhya
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baby
Party Age
57
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Sunilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is restrained from encroaching into petition ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ schedule property and from committing any act of waste therein.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vijayamma vs Anu et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vijayamma vs Anu et al regarding ad-interim injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won