Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 354/2019

Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-03-06
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 03/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Rajendran, Prasanna, and Ammini filed a suit against M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited and Sanoj. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no steps taken to adduce evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and failure to take steps for adduction of evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and failure to take steps for adduction of evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and adduce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and adduce evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. No steps taken to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajendran
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prasanna
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ammini
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanoj
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Rajendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Semeen N. Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Devadas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no evidence being presented.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/06/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won