Case Summary
The plaintiff, Jasmine, filed a suit against the defendants, V.S. Geetha and others, for recovery of money after they failed to convert property from paddy field to dry land as per their agreement. The suit claims for return of an advance sale consideration with interest.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to a decree for realisation of Rs.8,00,000/- with future interest of 14% per annum with monthly rest from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter with interest @ 6% per annum till its realisation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, Jasmine, and ordered the defendants to pay a total of Rs.8,00,000/- along with interest for failing to comply with the terms of the agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendants failed to perform their part of the agreement.
The plaintiff proved that the defendants failed to perform their part of the agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is entitled to realise Rs.5,00,000/- as the principle amount given by the plaintiff in the agreement along with Rs.3,00,000/- as the interest amount with future interest at the rate of 14% per annum with monthly rest from the date of suit.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to a decree for realisation of Rs.8,00,000/- with future interest of 14% per annum with monthly rest from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter with interest @ 6% per annum till its realisation.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jasmine
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.S. Geetha
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajith
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Biju
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement dated 27.01.2018, Lawyer notice dated 29.05.2020, Postal receipts, Acknowledgment cards, Reply Notice
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Shanavas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S. Asharaf
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.A. Sireesha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested the recovery of Rs.8,00,000/- including principal and interest.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff is entitled to a decree for realisation of Rs.8,00,000/- with future interest of 14% per annum with monthly rest from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter with interest @ 6% per annum till its realisation.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Agreement for sale
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court relied on this agreement to establish the basis of the transaction and obligations of the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence of the communication sent to the defendants regarding non-compliance with the agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Postal Receipts
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts support the plaintiff's claim of sending the lawyer notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3 series
Document Type:
Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These cards confirm receipt of the lawyer notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4 series
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the response from the defendants denying the claims in the plaintiff's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Udyam registration certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate is relevant to establish the legitimacy of the plaintiff's business.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
G.S.T. Registration Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the financial credibility of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Jasmine vs V.S. Geetha et al regarding recovery of money and other consequential reliefs.
Case Code Year
Case between Jasmine vs V.S. Geetha et al regarding recovery of money and other consequential reliefs.