Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1344/2018

Case between Blassy Cambus vs P.Ancil regarding realization of money

Court
Additional Munsiff-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh S.V
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-8 years 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Blassy Cambus is the plaintiff seeking recovery of Rs.2,57,030/- from P.Ancil, the defendant, who allegedly borrowed money under the assurance of repayment. The defendant has denied the allegations, claiming the money was related to construction for the plaintiff's brother.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found insufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for the recovery of money, ruling in favor of the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found insufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for the recovery of money, ruling in favor of the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to prove a creditor-debtor relationship and provided insufficient evidence to support her claims.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to prove a creditor-debtor relationship and provided insufficient evidence to support her claims.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has failed to prove her case by the yardstick of preponderance of probabilities. The defendant has succeeded in probabilizing his version before Court.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Blassy Cambus
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.Ancil
Party Age
72
Plaintiffs Documents
Bank passbook of Syndicate Bank, Vettucaud branch.
Defendants Documents
Reply Issued Under Right to Information Act, Details of Building Materials, Certified Copy of computer print of Statement of account.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. B.Jayachandran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.S Satheeshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs.2,57,030/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has failed to prove her case by the yardstick of preponderance of probabilities.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Bank Passbook
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to demonstrate the financial transactions between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Reply Issued Under Right to Information
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provided information related to the complaint filed regarding construction issues.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Details of Building Materials
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documented the materials related to the construction, relevant for the defendant's claims.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Certified Copy of Computer Print of Statement of Account
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Brought evidence regarding financial transactions related to the construction of the house.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: True Copy of Relevant Page of Petition Register Maintained at Valiyathura Police Station
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Used to corroborate the existence of a complaint regarding house construction.
Reference:
Ext.X1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Blassy Cambus vs P.Ancil regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Blassy Cambus vs P.Ancil regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of Travancore vs Remonykumar regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sheeja.N regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh Kumar.G regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of Travancore et al vs M/s Talipot Technology Solutions Ltd. et al regarding court fee remittance
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won