Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 192/ 2018

Case between Devakumar vs Asokan et al regarding impleading an additional defendant.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND.P
Order Date
2025-06-18
Duration
approximately-6 years 4 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Devakumar is the plaintiff in a suit for realization of money against Asokan and others. The court is considering a petition to implead an administrator as an additional defendant in the ongoing case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition to implead an additional defendant as the petitioner failed to demonstrate necessity.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition to implead an additional defendant as the petitioner failed to demonstrate necessity.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the financial transaction was personal and did not involve the other parties.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the financial transaction was personal and did not involve the other parties.
Supporting Evidence
The first respondent has issued his personal cheque. The cheque is not issued in official capacity.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Devakumar
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asokan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.N.D.P. Vakkom, Sakha 507
Relation
represented by its President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.N.D.P. Vakkom, Sakha 507
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manger, Prabodhini, UPS, Vakkom
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Vijayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petition to implead the administrator of S.N.D.P Vakkom Sakha No. 507 as additional defendant No. 5.
Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Costs to be suffered by both parties.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the petition, both parties are directed to suffer their respective costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Devakumar vs Asokan et al regarding impleading an additional defendant.
Case Code Year
Case between Devakumar vs Asokan et al regarding impleading an additional defendant.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Wed, 02/21/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

S.N.D.P. Vakkom

Similar Cases

Case between Shibu vs Ajeesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vijayakumari vs Induslnd Bank regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sainulabdeen vs Sajeer regarding balance court fee
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of Travancore et al vs M/s Talipot Technology Solutions Ltd. et al regarding court fee remittance
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won