Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 453/2024

Case between Vijayakumari vs Induslnd Bank regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-06-04
Duration
approximately-2 years 1 month
Case Closed
Wed, 06/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Vijayakumari and Prakash, are husband and wife who filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Induslnd Bank. They seek to prevent the bank from forcefully taking possession of their autorickshaw due to loan repayment demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendant from forcefully taking possession of the plaint schedule vehicle.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from forcefully taking possession of the plaint schedule vehicle.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendant from forcefully taking possession of the plaint schedule vehicle.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged oral evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established their case through unchallenged oral evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Through the unchallenged oral evidence adduced by the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs have established their case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiffs and the defendant is restrained from forcefully taking possession of the plaint schedule vehicle.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayakumari
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prakash
Party Age
63
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Induslnd Bank
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of cash bill No. GWKL/10//1819 issued by Kallingal Auto Mobiles, Copy of RC Book against KL.16-T-8704, Copy of statement, Copy of receipt, Copy of Final report in Crime No. 496/2023 before the JFMC-Paravoor, Copy of estimate prepared by Manju Automobiles, Copy of order in WP(C) No. 8260/2022 of Hon. High Court of Kerala.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Biji. R.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiffs restraining the defendant from forcefully taking possession of the plaint schedule vehicle.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiffs and the defendant is restrained from forcefully taking possession of the plaint schedule vehicle.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cash Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of cash bill issued by Kallingal Auto Mobiles for the purchase of the autorickshaw.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: RC Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the registration certificate for the autorickshaw.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of statement relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of a receipt related to the transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Final report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of final report in Crime No. 496/2023 before the JFMC-Paravoor.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Estimate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the estimate prepared by Manju Automobiles.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Court Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of order in WP(C) No. 8260/2022 of Hon. High Court of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Vijayakumari vs Induslnd Bank regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vijayakumari vs Induslnd Bank regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Fri, 04/28/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 06/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of Travancore vs Remonykumar regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sheeja.N regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh Kumar.G regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of Travancore et al vs M/s Talipot Technology Solutions Ltd. et al regarding court fee remittance
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won