Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 120/ 2025

Case between Balachandran et al vs Sajith et al regarding ad-interim injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-03-17
Duration
Case Code No.
120
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Balachandran and others, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the respondents, Sajith and others, to prevent encroachment on their property. The court has found prima facie evidence indicating that irreparable injury may occur without the injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction, preventing the respondents from encroaching on the petitioners' property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction against encroachment
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction, preventing the respondents from encroaching on the petitioners' property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was established demonstrating the likelihood of irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and committing any act of waste therein until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Balachandran
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bijoy
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alen
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Babu
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajith
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudarsanan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jithin
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayadas
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jalaja Raveendran
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. Smart
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and committing any act of waste therein until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioners.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sreedevi Amma. G. vs G. Sreekumari Amma et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajitha. M. vs Sasi et al regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won