Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 64/2025

Case between Sreedevi Amma. G. vs G. Sreekumari Amma et al regarding ad-interim injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-02-07
Duration
Case Code No.
64
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sreedevi Amma. G. is the petitioner seeking an ad-interim injunction against the respondents, G. Sreekumari Amma and T.V. Manikantan Nair, regarding the obstruction of a pathway. The court has determined that a prima facie case is made out.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the petitioner's use of a specific pathway until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the petitioner's use of a specific pathway until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that a prima facie case was made out and irreparable injury would occur without the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that a prima facie case was made out and irreparable injury would occur without the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from obstructing the use of petition B schedule pathway by the petitioner in any manner until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreedevi Amma. G.
Party Age
73
Relation
C/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
G. Sreekumari Amma
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.V. Manikantan Nair
Party Age
62
Relation
s/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Plaint, affidavit and documents produced by the petitioner.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Anitha's Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondents are restrained from obstructing the use of petition B schedule pathway by the petitioner in any manner until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sajitha. M. vs Sasi et al regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Balachandran et al vs Sajith et al regarding ad-interim injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won