Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 219/ 2024

Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri.ARAVIND.P
Order Date
2025-04-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Resmi, the petitioner, is seeking a temporary injunction against her father Sureshkumar and his siblings, who are allegedly trying to alienate property against her father's interest. The petitioner claims her father is vulnerable due to his health conditions.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for a temporary injunction, finding no prima facie case in favor of the petitioner, Resmi, and ruled that granting an injunction would cause irreparable injury to the respondents.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for a temporary injunction, finding no prima facie case in favor of the petitioner, Resmi, and ruled that granting an injunction would cause irreparable injury to the respondents.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to demonstrate a prima facie case or balance of convenience in her favor.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that since the additional fifth respondent/first defendant is not suffering from any mental infirmities, there is no need to pass an interim injunction order restraining the additional fifth respondent/first defendant from alienating or encumbering the petition schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed. There is no order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Resmi
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sureshkumar
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kavidas
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathidas
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kavitha
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Sunil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Bijukumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Asv.Niyas A.Salam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Temporary injunction to restrain the first defendant from alienating or encumbering the petition schedule properties.
Evidence:
this court finds no prima facie case and balance of convenience in favour of the petitioner

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram Dist.
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won