Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 131/2025

Case between R. Snehalatha vs Sarachandra Babu regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P
Order Date
2025-03-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

R. Snehalatha filed a petition against Sarachandra Babu seeking an injunction to prevent interference with her water access. The court determined that granting the injunction was necessary to avoid irreparable harm.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an interim injunction to R. Snehalatha, preventing Sarachandra Babu from obstructing her water access. This was deemed necessary to avoid irreparable harm.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction against the respondent preventing interference with water access.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an interim injunction to R. Snehalatha, preventing Sarachandra Babu from obstructing her water access. This was deemed necessary to avoid irreparable harm.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was made out indicating potential irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondent is restrained from preventing the petitioner from drawing water from the petition B schedule well and further restrained from destroying the pipe which are drawing to petition A schedule property until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
R. Snehalatha
Party Age
75
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarachandra Babu
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.V. Shinu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Joy Bhaskar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is restrained from preventing the petitioner from drawing water from the petition B schedule well and further restrained from destroying the pipe which are drawing to petition A schedule property until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between R. Snehalatha vs Sarachandra Babu regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between R. Snehalatha vs Sarachandra Babu regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won