Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 354/2019

Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-03-06
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 03/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs Rajendran, Prasanna, and Ammini against defendants M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited and Sanoj. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and no evidence being presented.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs and defendant D1 were absent at the hearing, and no evidence was presented.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs and defendant D1 were absent at the hearing, and no evidence was presented.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their failure to adduce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their failure to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajendran
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prasanna
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ammini
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanoj
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Rajendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Semeen N. Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Devadas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/06/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (India) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (Indigo) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction against business interference.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayyappan vs Chandramathy regarding dismissal of suit
MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sameer vs Laboodha Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won