Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 127/2025

Case between Abhijith et al vs Mohandas regarding injunction against encroachment

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND.P
Order Date
2025-03-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Abhijith and Jalajakumari Amma, are seeking an injunction against the defendant, Mohandas, regarding the encroachment of property. The court found that failure to grant the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from encroaching on the petitioners' property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining encroachment
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from encroaching on the petitioners' property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was made out by the petitioners which necessitated the granting of the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondent is restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abhijith
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jalajakumari Amma
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohandas
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Bilahari. G.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioners.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abhijith et al vs Mohandas regarding injunction against encroachment
Case Code Year
Case between Abhijith et al vs Mohandas regarding injunction against encroachment

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won