Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1379/2016

Case between Antony Prince vs HDFC Bank Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-10-07
Duration
approximately-9 years
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute between Antony Prince and HDFC Bank Ltd regarding a loan for a vehicle. The plaintiff seeks an injunction to prevent the bank from taking possession of the vehicle due to alleged defaults in payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The application for arbitration was dismissed, allowing the civil suit to proceed. This decision upholds the jurisdiction of the court despite the arbitration clause in the agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The application for arbitration was dismissed, allowing the civil suit to proceed. This decision upholds the jurisdiction of the court despite the arbitration clause in the agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court held that the suit is maintainable in civil court despite the arbitration clause.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court held that the suit is maintainable in civil court despite the arbitration clause.
Supporting Evidence
The suit for injunction alleging and apprehending illegal recovery of possession of a vehicle by force... would certainly fall under the jurisdiction and power of the civil court.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this application is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Antony Prince
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
HDFC Bank Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Branch Manager, HDFC Bank Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Ext.A1: Loan Agreement

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Sathisan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.S.Gopinathan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Dileep Sathyan.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from forcibly taking possession of a vehicle.
Evidence:
the suit is maintainable notwithstanding the arbitration of the civil court.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The loan agreement is referenced as the basis for the arbitration clause and details of the loan given for purchase of the vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Antony Prince vs HDFC Bank Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Antony Prince vs HDFC Bank Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of Travancore vs Remonykumar regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sheeja.N regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh Kumar.G regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of Travancore et al vs M/s Talipot Technology Solutions Ltd. et al regarding court fee remittance
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won