Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 433/2019

Case between Sainulabdeen vs Sajeer regarding rejection of suit due to non-payment of court fees.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-03-06
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days
Case Closed
Thu, 03/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sainulabdeen is the plaintiff, and Sajeer is the defendant. The case revolves around the rejection of the plaintiff's suit due to non-payment of the necessary court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected due to the failure to remit the required court fees despite multiple opportunities.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected due to the failure to remit the required court fees despite multiple opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff failed to comply with the court's directive to remit the court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff failed to comply with the court's directive to remit the court fees.
Supporting Evidence
It is noted that repeated opportunities produced to the plaintiff to remit BCF. Even then the plaintiff is not remitted the BCF.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sainulabdeen
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajeer
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Vijayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected due to non-remittance of BCF.
Evidence:
So this court is of the view that no further time need be granted. Hence the suit is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sainulabdeen vs Sajeer regarding rejection of suit due to non-payment of court fees.
Case Code Year
Case between Sainulabdeen vs Sajeer regarding rejection of suit due to non-payment of court fees.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Wed, 03/06/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/06/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won