Case Summary
Nahas filed a suit against Sabansa and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the petitioner’s counsel submitted a memo indicating no further pursuit of the action.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed by the court as the plaintiff indicated no further pursuit of the case.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel of the petitioner filed not pressed memo.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nahas
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sabansa
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajeev
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shajahan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Naseela
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shahida
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R. Suresh Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. Jain
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nahas vs Sabansa et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Nahas vs Sabansa et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.