Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 132/ 2025

Case between Kannan vs Anoob. V.R. regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P
Order Date
2025-03-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kannan is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Anoob. V.R. The court determined that granting the injunction is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court issued an interim injunction in favor of the petitioner, preventing the defendant from evicting him and obstructing his clinic's operation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court issued an interim injunction in favor of the petitioner, preventing the defendant from evicting him and obstructing his clinic's operation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was made, indicating that the petitioner would suffer irreparable harm without the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A. will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the counter petitioner is restrained from, forcefully evicting the petitioner from the petition schedule property and further restrained from obstructing the function of the petitioner’s clinic in the petition schedule property until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kannan
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nandu
Party Age
33
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anoob. V.R.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Plaint, affidavit and other documents produced by the petitioner.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. F. Nahas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.M. Fathima
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraint from forcefully evicting the petitioner from the petition schedule property and obstructing the function of the petitioner’s clinic.
Evidence:
Hence the counter petitioner is restrained from, forcefully evicting the petitioner from the petition schedule property and further restrained from obstructing the function of the petitioner’s clinic in the petition schedule property until further order.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kannan vs Anoob. V.R. regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kannan vs Anoob. V.R. regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won