Case Summary
Mahesh Lal filed a suit against Salimkuty and Sachin S. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed by the court as not pressed by the petitioner without any order as to costs.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed because the petitioner filed a not pressed memo.
The suit was dismissed because the petitioner filed a not pressed memo.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed because the petitioner filed a not pressed memo.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mahesh Lal
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Salimkuty
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sachin S.
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Hari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. Safeerkutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. Abdul Samad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mahesh Lal vs Salimkuty et al regarding dismissal of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Mahesh Lal vs Salimkuty et al regarding dismissal of the suit.