Case Summary
The petitioners, including Sarasamma, Prasobha, and Velayudhan, are involved in a case against the respondents, Shobhana and Pradeep, regarding an interim application. The court has allowed the petition and appointed an advocate commissioner for inspection.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed the petition, appointed Advocate commissioner
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed by the court, and appointments for commissioners were made. The petitioners are required to deposit specified amounts.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the materials presented warranted the granting of the petition.
The court found that the materials presented warranted the granting of the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
After considering the materials, this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is allowed. Advocate G.Krishnakumar is appointed as the Advocate commissioner and Sri.Sivanandan is appointed as the Co-commissioner.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sarasamma
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- D/o Saradha
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasobha
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- D/o Sarasamma
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Velayudhan
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- S/o Neelakandan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shobhana
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o Preman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pradeep
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o Preman
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sabir. F. Haq
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gireesh. G.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed.
Evidence:
After considering the materials, this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court appointed an Advocate commissioner and a Co-commissioner for conducting an inspection.
Reference:
null
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The court heard both sides represented.
Reference:
null
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Shobhana et al regarding IA. 01/2024
Case Code Year
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Shobhana et al regarding IA. 01/2024