Similar Cases
Based on: COUNTER CLAIM No. 33/ 2022 — Case between Reetha vs M.M. Hashim regarding counter claim.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
COUNTER CLAIM . No. 328/2019
Case between Anilkumar et al vs G.S. Deepa regarding declaration, fixation of boundary and consequential decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves a dispute over the ownership and boundaries of a property. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants attempted to encroach on their property, leading to a counterclaim for a prohibitory injunction.
Counter Claim
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.1379/2014
Case between Ouseph @ Santhosh et al vs Stella Victo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves a dispute over a pathway claimed by the plaintiff, Ouseph @ Santhosh, against the defendant, Stella Victo. The plaintiff alleges obstruction by the defendant, which has led to this suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Counter Claim
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1745 /2023
Case between Advaita Srikant vs Hilur M. Sainudeen regarding Counter Claim
Advaita Srikant is the counter claim plaintiff and Hilur M. Sainudeen is the counter claim defendant. The court dismissed the counter claim as not pressed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Counter Claim
Defendant Won
OS.No.1350/2019
Case between SNDP Saka No.1068, Vattiyoorkavu et al vs Vilasini et al regarding Counter Claim
The case involves a counter claim filed by SNDP Saka No.1068, Vattiyoorkavu against defendants Vilasini and Subhadra Rajan. The court dismissed the counter claim due to the absence of both parties and the lack of a chief affidavit.
Counter Claim
Defendant Won
OS.No.1447/2008
Case between Velukutty et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding Counter Claim
The case involves a counter claim where Gopalakrishnan and others are opposing the claims made by the additional defendants. The counter claim was dismissed by the court due to the plaintiffs' absence in presenting evidence.
Counter Claim
Defendant Won
COUNTER CLAIM . No. 144/2018
Case between Baby Girija vs Gopalakrishnan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves a counter claim for a permanent prohibitory injunction filed by Baby Girija against Gopalakrishnan. Baby Girija, a cancer patient, has been running a provision store but is facing threats from Gopalakrishnan to vacate the shop room.
Counter Claim
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 614/2021
Case between Sherly Thomas et al vs Jeejan regarding counter claim
The case involves Sherly Thomas and others as plaintiffs against Jeejan as the defendant concerning a counter claim. The counter claim was dismissed as not pressed during the hearing.
Counter Claim
Defendant Won
OS. No.358/2015
Case between Thottadivila Residents Association vs Mallika regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The Thottadivila Residents Association seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against Mallika to prevent her from trespassing onto their property. The counter claim involves disputes over property rights and claims of illegal encroachment.
Counter Claim
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 24/2024
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
Babu Rajan N. and Raveendran Pillai are suing the Government of Kerala for a declaration of civil death of their brother, Mr. Rajendran N., who has been missing for 28 years. They require this declaration to facilitate obtaining a legal heirship certificate to pledge their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.41/2025
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
Sheena, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Anvar and Ramabhadran to stop an illegal chicken stall operating in a shop room owned by Ramabhadran. The plaintiff alleges threats and illegal constructions facilitated by Anvar.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 117/2021
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
The case involves The Federal Bank, Ltd represented by its Manager against defendants Siyad. S and Haseena Beevi. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
The petitioners, children of the deceased Solomon Cruz, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property purchased by their father, while the defendants claim rights over a portion of the property. The case involves disputes over property tax and land boundaries.
Civil Suit
OS No. 361/2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
Sunitha, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant, to prevent alleged encroachment on her property. The dispute arises from a badminton court construction agreement and ownership claims over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 361/ 2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction
Sunitha, the plaintiff, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant. The case involves a dispute over property rights and the construction of a badminton court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 43/2025
Case between Nithin Krishna vs Gireesh et al regarding suit dismissal
Nithin Krishna is the plaintiff, and Gireesh along with others are the defendants in this case. The plaintiff filed a memo of not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 156/ 2025
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
The case involves A. Shahjahan and others as plaintiffs against Shaji and Krishna Kumar regarding a petition for an injunction related to property encroachment. The court finds that a prima facie case exists for granting an interim injunction to prevent irreparable injury to the plaintiffs.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 229/2021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The case involves Ayisha Beevi as the plaintiff, represented by her son Navas, against defendants Noushad and Shajahan. The court is hearing a petition regarding an injunction to prevent the defendants from alienating certain property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 229/22021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The plaintiffs, Ayisha Beevi and her son Navas, are seeking to prevent the defendants, Noushad and Shajahan, from alienating a property. The court has issued an interim order to maintain the status quo until a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 147/2025
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
Anoop. P is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Lissy. P. S, the respondent. The court determined that a prima facie case was made out and granted a temporary injunction.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 219/ 2024
Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Resmi, the petitioner, is seeking a temporary injunction against her father Sureshkumar and his siblings, who are allegedly trying to alienate property against her father's interest. The petitioner claims her father is vulnerable due to his health conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 14/2022
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
The plaintiffs are the close relatives of Mr. Suresh Babu, who has been missing since 15.08.1990. They seek a declaration of his civil death to facilitate legal proceedings regarding his estate.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 79/2025
Case between Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust et al vs Raju et al regarding election to the director board of first petitioner trust
This case involves a petition by Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust and others against Raju and others regarding preventing the election to the director board of the trust. The defendants were restrained from interfering with the election process until the suit is disposed of.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 179/2024
Case between Nahas vs Sabansa et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Nahas filed a suit against Sabansa and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the petitioner’s counsel submitted a memo indicating no further pursuit of the action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 340/2024
Case between Mahesh Lal vs Salimkuty et al regarding dismissal of the suit.
Mahesh Lal filed a suit against Salimkuty and Sachin S. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP.No 15/2024 IN OS No. 59//2008
Case between Udha vs Chandramgathan et al regarding execution of decree.
The plaintiffs, Udha and a deceased party Ponnamma, are executing a decree against the defendants, which include Chandramgathan and his legal heirs. The court found that the execution petition has been satisfied.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 137/2025
Case between Reenamony vs Remany, Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju regarding injunction
Reenamony is the petitioner seeking protection against the defendants Remany and Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju. The case involves a request for an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 72/2025
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
The plaintiffs, led by Shahida Beevi, and defendants, led by Nahas, settled their disputes through out-of-court discussions. The joint compromise was accepted by the court, leading to the decree.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 150/2016
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
Rajesh and Sheeja are the plaintiffs, while Sofiya and Bijeer are the defendants. The case involved a dispute that was settled through out-of-court discussions, leading to a joint compromise.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
The plaintiffs are seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from constructing on a property that the plaintiffs claim. The dispute involves allegations of encroachment and ownership over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Shobhana et al regarding IA. 01/2024
The petitioners, including Sarasamma, Prasobha, and Velayudhan, are involved in a case against the respondents, Shobhana and Pradeep, regarding an interim application. The court has allowed the petition and appointed an advocate commissioner for inspection.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.136/2025
Case between Vijayamma vs Anu et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Vijayamma filed a petition seeking an ad-interim injunction against Anu and others. The court found that failure to grant the injunction could cause irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 132/ 2025
Case between Kannan vs Anoob. V.R. regarding injunction
Kannan is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Anoob. V.R. The court determined that granting the injunction is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 166/2019
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
Thulaseedharan, the plaintiff, has died, and no legal heirs have taken steps to continue the case. As a result, the court decided to abate the suit.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 167/2019
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
Shine is the plaintiff and Thulaseedharan is the defendant. The court has abated the suit due to the death of the defendant and the lack of actions taken to implead the legal heir.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 403/2019
Case between Anilkumar vs Bindhu regarding execution petition
Anilkumar is the decree holder in this execution petition against Bindhu, the judgment debtor. The court dismissed the execution petition as default due to the absence of the decree holder during the proceedings.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
OS NO. 131/2025
Case between R. Snehalatha vs Sarachandra Babu regarding injunction
R. Snehalatha filed a petition against Sarachandra Babu seeking an injunction to prevent interference with her water access. The court determined that granting the injunction was necessary to avoid irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 126/2025
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
Anilal, Vonodlal, Prameela, and Hema are the petitioners seeking an injunction against the respondent Harilal regarding certain properties. The court granted a temporary injunction to prevent any encumbrance or alienation of the schedule properties.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 127/2025
Case between Abhijith et al vs Mohandas regarding injunction against encroachment
The petitioners, Abhijith and Jalajakumari Amma, are seeking an injunction against the defendant, Mohandas, regarding the encroachment of property. The court found that failure to grant the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the petitioners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO.128/2025
Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
Arya.G, the plaintiff, is seeking an injunction against Deepthi Sinha, the defendant, to prevent encroachment on her property. The court has found a prima facie case for the injunction.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.P. SUCCESSION NO. 05/2024
Case between Ambika S.V. et al vs NIL regarding issuance of a succession certificate.
The petitioners, consisting of the wife and children of deceased N. Prabha, are seeking a succession certificate for assets left intestate. They are the only legal heirs entitled to inherit the deceased's shares in Varna Herbal Gardens Limited.
Succession
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 157/2020
Case between Thajuneesa vs Mohammad fanab et al regarding petition for legal heirship
The case involves a petition filed by Roshida regarding legal heirship of the deceased plaintiff Thajuneesa. The court found that Roshida is not the sole legal heir and dismissed the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 224/2022
Case between Sunil Kumar Narayanan et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sunil Kumar Narayanan and Manju Narayanan, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other authorities for a permanent prohibitory injunction. They contested the government's acquisition of their property without proper measurement and valuation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 120/ 2025
Case between Balachandran et al vs Sajith et al regarding ad-interim injunction
The petitioners, Balachandran and others, are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the respondents, Sajith and others, to prevent encroachment on their property. The court has found prima facie evidence indicating that irreparable injury may occur without the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 266/2019
Case between Nancy vs Reeja regarding rejection of suit
The case involves Nancy as the plaintiff and Reeja as the defendant. The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 229/2020
Case between Shan vs Sajeesh Kumar regarding balance court fee
Shan is the plaintiff and Sajeesh Kumar is the defendant in this case regarding the non-remittance of balance court fee. The court ultimately rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with the requirement.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 112/2025
Case between Rakeeb vs Rameesa et al regarding injunction
Rakeeb, the plaintiff, seeks an injunction against Rameesa and others, who are the defendants. The court finds that a prima facie case exists and that not granting the injunction would cause irreparable harm.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 114/2025
Case between Maunudeen. M vs Shakir et al regarding encroachment and injunction
The case involves Maunudeen. M as the plaintiff seeking an injunction against the defendants, Shakir and others, to prevent encroachment. The court found that a prima facie case was established.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 357/2021
Case between Yakub vs Chandrika Devadas et al regarding transfer of suit
The case involves Yakub as the plaintiff against defendants Chandrika Devadas, Prasobhana Sugunan, Premraj, Prasad, and Prasanna Sreerengan. The court decided to transfer the suit to the Hon'ble Sub Court Attingal.
Original Suit