Original Suit No. 166/2019

Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA

Judge

Sri. ARAVIND P.

Order Date

2025-03-24

Duration

Case Closed

Mon, 03/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Thulaseedharan, the plaintiff, has died, and no legal heirs have taken steps to continue the case. As a result, the court decided to abate the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Original Suit

Final Judgment

The court abated the suit due to the death of the plaintiff and lack of action from the legal heirs.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's death and failure of legal heirs to take action led to the abatement of the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

It is noted that repeated opportunities provided to the legal heirs of the plaintiff to take steps for filing impleading petition. After considering the materials, this court is of the view that no further time need be granted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is abated. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thulaseedharan
Party Age: 70
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shine
Party Age: 38
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Sureshkumar P.S.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Ambu B.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. D. Anilkumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Manilal S.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Biju K.R.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Abated

Description:

The suit is abated due to the inability to implead the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff.

Evidence:

Hence the suit is abated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification