Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 72/2025

Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-03-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Shahida Beevi, and defendants, led by Nahas, settled their disputes through out-of-court discussions. The joint compromise was accepted by the court, leading to the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the joint compromise filed by both parties. The suit was decreed in accordance with the terms of the compromise without any order as to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the joint compromise filed by both parties. The suit was decreed in accordance with the terms of the compromise without any order as to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the joint compromise were lawful and accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the joint compromise were lawful and accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
The court heard and perused the records including the joint compromise. Joint compromise is accepted. Since the terms are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is decreed in terms of joint compromise. Joint compromise and the agreement will form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shahida Beevi
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Naisam
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shajahan
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nahas
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naseela
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheeja
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. J. Shihabudeen Kuriyedath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Sarika S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of joint compromise.
Evidence:
Joint compromise is accepted. Since the terms are lawful. Hence the suit is decreed in terms of joint compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
Case Code Year
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Premkumar Potty vs Biju et al regarding settlement in Lok adalath.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jalathmajan vs Tyagarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sulatha vs Reetha regarding default dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. S.R. Educational and Charitable Trust et al vs M/S Asset Reconstructions Company (India) Ltd. regarding withdrawal of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Poorna Printing and Publishing House vs Pala Ninna Poika Residence Association et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won