Case Summary
The case involves a dispute between Sulatha and Reetha. Both parties were represented in court, but the suit was dismissed for default due to no steps taken for adducing evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of both parties and no steps taken to proceed with the evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sulatha
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reetha
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. Sreedharan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Hemachandran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sulatha vs Reetha regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Sulatha vs Reetha regarding default dismissal