Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No. 243/2014 — Case between Sulatha vs Reetha regarding default dismissal
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 72/2025
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
The plaintiffs, led by Shahida Beevi, and defendants, led by Nahas, settled their disputes through out-of-court discussions. The joint compromise was accepted by the court, leading to the decree.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 80/2025
Case between M/s. Poorna Printing and Publishing House vs Pala Ninna Poika Residence Association et al regarding dismissal of suit
M/s. Poorna Printing and Publishing House filed a suit against Pala Ninna Poika Residence Association and several defendants. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 15/2025
Case between M/s. S.R. Educational and Charitable Trust et al vs M/S Asset Reconstructions Company (India) Ltd. regarding withdrawal of suit
M/s. S.R. Educational and Charitable Trust and its Chairman, Shaji R., are involved in a suit against M/S Asset Reconstructions Company (India) Ltd. The plaintiffs are permitted to withdraw the suit as per the court's order.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 131/2012
Case between Jalathmajan vs Tyagarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit
Jalathmajan filed a suit against Tyagarajan and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 142/2020
Case between Premkumar Potty vs Biju et al regarding settlement in Lok adalath.
This case involves Premkumar Potty as the plaintiff and Biju along with Soorya as defendants. The matter was settled in Lok adalath with an award passed.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 288/2019
Case between Devadasan Pillai et al vs Suseela et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
The case involves Devadasan Pillai and Saralabhai Amma as plaintiffs and Suseela and Raji as defendants. The suit was dismissed for default as there were no instructions from the plaintiffs.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 57/2021
Case between Gopi et al vs Raju et al regarding abatement of suit
The plaintiffs, Gopi and Sakunthala, are represented through their next friend Baby Sindhu. The defendants include Raju and others. The case is about the abatement of the suit due to no steps taken to implead legal heirs.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 1308/2021
Case between Kerala Cricket Association (KCA) vs Eternal Sports Private Limited regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves the Kerala Cricket Association (KCA) as the plaintiff and Eternal Sports Private Limited as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's lack of representation.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 446/ 2018
Case between Ravi vs Ashokan et al regarding declaration and consequential permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Ravi and additional plaintiff Rajani, are siblings suing their brothers Ashokan and Sasi, and sister Remani over property rights following their parents' death. They seek to declare a settlement deed void and partition the property.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 439/2023
Case between Muhammed Gasini et al vs Vaheeda Beevi regarding partition
The case involves a partition of property among the plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of Mr. Muhammed Sidni, and the defendant, Vaheeda Beevi. The plaintiffs claim their rights over the property after the death of their mother, Mrs. Majida Beevi.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 308 OF 2014
Case between Abdulla vs Sainaba et al regarding undisclosed matter
Abdulla filed an original suit against multiple defendants at the Court of the Munsiff of Tirur. The suit was ongoing since 2014.
Original Suit
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 109 OF 2018
Case between Beevi et al vs Muhammedali et al regarding declaration.
The plaintiffs Beevi and others filed a suit for declaration against the defendants Muhammedali and another. The matter was settled in adalath and an award was passed.
Original Suit
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 14/2022
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
The plaintiffs are the close relatives of Mr. Suresh Babu, who has been missing since 15.08.1990. They seek a declaration of his civil death to facilitate legal proceedings regarding his estate.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 354/2019
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default
This case involves plaintiffs Rajendran, Prasanna, and Ammini against defendants M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited and Sanoj. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and no evidence being presented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 236/2018
Case between Sameer vs Laboodha Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sameer, the plaintiff, has filed a suit against Laboodha Beevi and others regarding a fixed deposit amount of 8,00,000/- in the Thiruvananthapuram District Co-operative Bank. The case concerns the refusal of the defendants to allot Sameer's rightful share of the deposit after the death of their father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 356/2020
Case between Sarasa.G et al vs Vikraman Unnithan et al regarding Restoration Petition
The case involves a restoration petition filed by the defendants Sarasa.G and Vinu.V.S against the counter petitioners Vikraman Unnithan, Raveendran Unnithan, and Prabha regarding a prior suit. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 198/2021
Case between Ayyappan vs Chandramathy regarding dismissal of suit
Ayyappan, the plaintiff, initiated a suit against Chandramathy, the defendant. The court dismissed the suit after the plaintiff's counsel filed a not pressed memo.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 47/ 2025
Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (Indigo) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction against business interference.
Arun. B.R. is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against M/s Indigo Capital (Indigo) Pvt Ltd. The court is addressing a request for temporary relief to prevent interference in the plaintiff's business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 47/2025
Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (India) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction.
Arun. B.R. is the petitioner seeking an ad-interim injunction against M/s Indigo Capital (India) Pvt Ltd and its director Mahesh Michael. The court found a prima facie case and granted temporary relief to prevent interference with the petitioner's business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 54/2024
Case between Sony.V.G vs Azhakamma. P et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Sony.V.G, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Azhakamma. P and Saboora Beevi, who have allegedly trespassed and illegally constructed on her property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property based on a settlement deed and power of attorney.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 246/2008
Case between Muhammed Ilyas vs Safarulla et al regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are Muhammed Ilyas and Thajudeen, while the defendants include Safarulla, Jameela, and Mariyam Beevi. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to adduce evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP. No 46/2023 IN OS No. 455//2017
Case between Chandran vs The Manager et al regarding execution of exparte decree
Chandran is the decree holder seeking execution of an exparte decree against The Manager of the Thiruvananthapuram District Co-operative Bank. The execution petition was addressed in court on November 17, 2025.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 273/2015
Case between Rafeeka et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of the suit
Rafeeka and others are the plaintiffs, while the State of Kerala and its officials are the defendants. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 174/2021
Case between Nithin Saseendran vs Design Alchemy Architects et al regarding Execution Petition
The case involves Nithin Saseendran as the decree holder and Design Alchemy Architects along with others as judgment debtors. An execution petition was heard and subsequently ordered by the court.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 158/ 2024
Case between Unnikrishnan Potty vs Vijayakrishnan Nampoothiri regarding dismissal for default
Unnikrishnan Potty is the plaintiff and Vijayakrishnan Nampoothiri is the defendant. The plaintiff did not appear in court despite multiple opportunities, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 507/2019
Case between Meenakshi vs Radha K.A. et al regarding mediation agreement
Meenakshi is the plaintiff seeking relief against Radha K.A. and other defendants. The court examined a mediation agreement entered into between the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 3.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.27/2021
Case between Suharabi CP et al vs Hasna Muhammed regarding IA No.151/24
The petition involves Hasna Muhammed as the petitioner and Suharabi CP along with Kuruvattoor Grama Panchayath as respondents. The case pertains to an application that was allowed by the court.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 98/2018
Case between I. Babu et al vs Sun Office Automation Pvt. Ltd. regarding dismissal of suit based on mediation agreement
The plaintiffs, I. Babu and others, filed a suit against Sun Office Automation Pvt. Ltd. regarding the execution of a mediation agreement. The court found the terms lawful and executable.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 205/2024
Case between Mukkam Tyres et al vs St. George Orthodox Suryan Church et al regarding mediation agreement.
Mukkam Tyres and Sejin Kurian are the plaintiffs. The defendants are St. George Orthodox Suryan Church and Abi Abraham. The case was about a dispute that was settled through mediation.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 110/2023
Case between Muhammed Ansar .P.K vs Punjab National Bank et al regarding dismissal for default.
Muhammed Ansar .P.K is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Punjab National Bank and Vinayan.M as defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff did not turn up for exparte evidence.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
EP No. 222/2025
Case between M/s. Kerala Trade Wings et al vs Khaleelul Rahman regarding petition.
The case involves M/s. Kerala Trade Wings as the petitioners and Khaleelul Rahman as the respondent. It pertains to a petition for the transmission of a decree.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 362/2023
Case between IBK Engineering, EPC Private Ltd vs The Manager, Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd et al regarding arbitration.
The case involves IBK Engineering against Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd concerning a dispute that has been referred to arbitration. The proceedings were conducted with the representation of advocates for both parties.
Original Suit
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 619/2025
Case between Sam Santhosh vs All Kerala CBSE State Kalolsav Committee et al regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves Sam Santhosh, a minor represented by his father, against the All Kerala CBSE State Kalolsav Committee and Sahodaya School Complex. The plaintiff sought relief, but the suit was not pressed.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 209/2022
Case between City Co-operative Hospital Ltd. et al vs Abdul Hameed, Hairunnisa regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
City Co-operative Hospital Ltd. is the plaintiff represented by its President, P. Moideen. The defendants are Abdul Hameed and Hairunnisa. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Original Suit
Dismissed
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 150/2016
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
Rajesh and Sheeja are the plaintiffs, while Sofiya and Bijeer are the defendants. The case involved a dispute that was settled through out-of-court discussions, leading to a joint compromise.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 166/2019
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
Thulaseedharan, the plaintiff, has died, and no legal heirs have taken steps to continue the case. As a result, the court decided to abate the suit.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 167/2019
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
Shine is the plaintiff and Thulaseedharan is the defendant. The court has abated the suit due to the death of the defendant and the lack of actions taken to implead the legal heir.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 266/2019
Case between Nancy vs Reeja regarding rejection of suit
The case involves Nancy as the plaintiff and Reeja as the defendant. The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 229/2020
Case between Shan vs Sajeesh Kumar regarding balance court fee
Shan is the plaintiff and Sajeesh Kumar is the defendant in this case regarding the non-remittance of balance court fee. The court ultimately rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with the requirement.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 357/2021
Case between Yakub vs Chandrika Devadas et al regarding transfer of suit
The case involves Yakub as the plaintiff against defendants Chandrika Devadas, Prasobhana Sugunan, Premraj, Prasad, and Prasanna Sreerengan. The court decided to transfer the suit to the Hon'ble Sub Court Attingal.
Original Suit
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 88/2025
Case between Sujetha Kumari R. vs Sooryanarayan Sinha et al regarding dismissal of suit
Sujetha Kumari R. is the plaintiff in this case against Sooryanarayan Sinha and others. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff filed a not pressed memo.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 05/2015
Case between Shamsudeen et al vs Sulekha Beevi regarding default dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiffs include Shamsudeen, Mohammed Ismail, and Khadija Beevi, who were involved in a suit against Sulekha Beevi. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the second plaintiff not adducing evidence and no further time granted.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 513/2014
Case between Sulekha Beevi vs Shamsudeen regarding default dismissal of suit
Sulekha Beevi is the plaintiff and Shamsudeen is the defendant. The case was dismissed for default as no evidence was presented.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 127/2014
Case between Rajan vs Pradeep et al regarding dismissal for default.
Rajan is the plaintiff, and Pradeep and Vasantha are the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to adduce evidence.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 349/2020
Case between Sujatha vs Chandrashekharan Pillai @ Mohanan regarding declaration of easement right by prescription and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Sujatha is the plaintiff claiming easement rights over a pathway to her property against Chandrashekharan Pillai. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant attempted to obstruct her access to the pathway, prompting her to file this suit.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 349/ 2020
Case between Sujatha vs Chandrashekharan Pillai @ Mohanan regarding declaration of easement right by prescription and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Sujatha filed a suit against Chandrashekharan Pillai regarding the right of easement over a pathway used for accessing her properties. The plaintiff claims a long-standing use of the pathway and seeks an injunction against the defendant's attempts to block it.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 234/2022
Case between Sarala et al vs Jayaram regarding settlement of disputes
The plaintiffs Sarala and Lohithakshan are involved in a legal dispute with the defendant Jayaram. The parties have settled their disputes through out of court discussions.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 287/2020
Case between Arifa Beevi vs Syamala regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Arifa Beevi filed a suit against Syamala for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent her from trespassing on certain property. The plaintiff claims ownership through her husband, who is currently abroad.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won