Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 150/2016

Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-03-27
Duration
approximately-8 years 9 months
Case Closed
Thu, 03/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajesh and Sheeja are the plaintiffs, while Sofiya and Bijeer are the defendants. The case involved a dispute that was settled through out-of-court discussions, leading to a joint compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in terms of a joint compromise between the parties, which will form part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in terms of a joint compromise between the parties, which will form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The joint compromise was accepted by the court as the terms were lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court perused the joint compromise and accepted it since the terms are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is decreed in terms of joint compromise. Joint compromise will form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajesh
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheeja
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sofiya
Party Age
50
Relation
Power of Attorney Holder of D2
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bijeer
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Joint compromise agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Thattathumala S. Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Shibu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of joint compromise.
Evidence:
Joint compromise is accepted since the terms are lawful.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
Case Code Year
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala Taluk
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Wed, 06/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nancy vs Reeja regarding rejection of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shan vs Sajeesh Kumar regarding balance court fee
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won