Case Summary
Shine is the plaintiff and Thulaseedharan is the defendant. The court has abated the suit due to the death of the defendant and the lack of actions taken to implead the legal heir.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is abated due to the death of the defendant with no further actions taken to implead the legal heir.
Key Reasoning:
Court found that sufficient opportunities were granted to the plaintiff to take necessary steps.
Court found that sufficient opportunities were granted to the plaintiff to take necessary steps.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
the court is of the view that the sufficient opportunities were granted.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is abated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shine
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thulaseedharan
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. D. Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Biju K.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sureshkumar P.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ambu B.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Abated
Description:
The suit is declared abated due to the death of the defendant and failure to implead the legal heir.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is abated.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit