Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 57/2021

Case between Gopi et al vs Raju et al regarding abatement of suit

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-06-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Gopi and Sakunthala, are represented through their next friend Baby Sindhu. The defendants include Raju and others. The case is about the abatement of the suit due to no steps taken to implead legal heirs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was abated as no steps were taken to implead the legal heirs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was abated as no steps were taken to implead the legal heirs.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was found to be abated due to the plaintiffs not taking necessary steps.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was found to be abated due to the plaintiffs not taking necessary steps.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that no steps were taken to implead legal heirs.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is abated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopi
Party Age
83
Relation
S/o Late Velu
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sakunthala
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o Gopi
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baby Sindhu
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o Devadasan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raju
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o Gopi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Karavaram Service Co-operative Bank Ltd
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajan
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o Gopi
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.S. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Nima Vinod
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The suit is abated.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is abated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopi et al vs Raju et al regarding abatement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Gopi et al vs Raju et al regarding abatement of suit

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Jalathmajan vs Tyagarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sulatha vs Reetha regarding default dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. S.R. Educational and Charitable Trust et al vs M/S Asset Reconstructions Company (India) Ltd. regarding withdrawal of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Poorna Printing and Publishing House vs Pala Ninna Poika Residence Association et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won