Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 273/2015

Case between Rafeeka et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of the suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-11-13
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rafeeka and others are the plaintiffs, while the State of Kerala and its officials are the defendants. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to proceed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and the failure to take necessary steps.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and the failure to take necessary steps.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and did not take any steps to pursue the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was absent and did not take any steps to pursue the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rafeeka
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Reeja
Party Age
31
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Riju
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Tahsildar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Village Officer
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.B. Vijayan Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Niyas A. Salam
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to no representation from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rafeeka et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of the suit
Case Code Year
Case between Rafeeka et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of the suit

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 11/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Arun. B.R. vs M/s Indigo Capital (Indigo) Pvt Ltd regarding injunction against business interference.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayyappan vs Chandramathy regarding dismissal of suit
MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sameer vs Laboodha Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajendran et al vs M/s Tower Vision India Private Limited et al regarding dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won