Case Summary
Rajan is the plaintiff, and Pradeep and Vasantha are the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to adduce evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and defendants. The court did not order any costs.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence.
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and no steps taken to adduce evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajan
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pradeep
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vasantha
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Sajichandralal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Roy D.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajan vs Pradeep et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Rajan vs Pradeep et al regarding dismissal for default.