Case Summary
Unnikrishnan Potty is the plaintiff and Vijayakrishnan Nampoothiri is the defendant. The plaintiff did not appear in court despite multiple opportunities, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence despite being given multiple opportunities.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence despite being given multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence despite being given multiple opportunities.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence despite being given multiple opportunities.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent. No representation. Even after producing repeated opportunities.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan Potty
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayakrishnan Nampoothiri
- Party Age
- 41
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Manikandan. V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
this court is of the view that the suit can be dismissed for default. Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Unnikrishnan Potty vs Vijayakrishnan Nampoothiri regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Unnikrishnan Potty vs Vijayakrishnan Nampoothiri regarding dismissal for default