Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 05/2015

Case between Shamsudeen et al vs Sulekha Beevi regarding default dismissal of the suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-03-10
Duration
approximately-10 years 0 days
Case Closed
Mon, 03/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include Shamsudeen, Mohammed Ismail, and Khadija Beevi, who were involved in a suit against Sulekha Beevi. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the second plaintiff not adducing evidence and no further time granted.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit and counter claim were dismissed for default as the plaintiffs failed to produce evidence. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit and counter claim were dismissed for default as the plaintiffs failed to produce evidence. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of evidence from the plaintiffs.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of evidence from the plaintiffs.
Supporting Evidence
This court is hereby no other option but to dismiss the suit for default.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. Counter claim plaintiff/ Defendant called absent. No steps taken to adduce evidence. Hence the counter claim is also dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shamsudeen
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohammed Ismail
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Khadija Beevi
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulekha Beevi
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. Rajasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Shibu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Sudheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
this court is hereby no other option but to dismiss the suit for default.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The counter claim was also dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence the counter claim is also dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shamsudeen et al vs Sulekha Beevi regarding default dismissal of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Shamsudeen et al vs Sulekha Beevi regarding default dismissal of the suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 03/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nancy vs Reeja regarding rejection of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won