Case Summary
Sulekha Beevi is the plaintiff and Shamsudeen is the defendant. The case was dismissed for default as no evidence was presented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and defendant, as no steps were taken to adduce evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as there were no steps taken to present evidence.
The suit was dismissed as there were no steps taken to present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
No steps taken to adduce evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sulekha Beevi
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shamsudeen
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Sudheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Shibu
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. Rajasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S. Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sulekha Beevi vs Shamsudeen regarding default dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sulekha Beevi vs Shamsudeen regarding default dismissal of suit