Case Summary
The case involves Nithin Saseendran as the decree holder and Design Alchemy Architects along with others as judgment debtors. An execution petition was heard and subsequently ordered by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the decree is transferred to the concerned court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder was represented and the court found merit in the execution petition.
The decree holder was represented and the court found merit in the execution petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder was represented and the court found merit in the execution petition.
The decree holder was represented and the court found merit in the execution petition.
Supporting Evidence
The decree holder was represented. Postage received.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the decree is transferred to concerned court.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nithin Saseendran
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Design Alchemy Architects
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sathyan
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Siyar Sathyan K S
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Prasanth. S. S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nithin Saseendran vs Design Alchemy Architects et al regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Nithin Saseendran vs Design Alchemy Architects et al regarding Execution Petition