Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 446/ 2018

Case between Ravi vs Ashokan et al regarding declaration and consequential permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-11-01
Duration
approximately-7 years 1 day
Case Closed
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Ravi and additional plaintiff Rajani, are siblings suing their brothers Ashokan and Sasi, and sister Remani over property rights following their parents' death. They seek to declare a settlement deed void and partition the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, setting aside the settlement deed and partitioning the property into four equal shares.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The settlement deed No. 670/2016 is set aside and the plaint schedule property shall be divided into four equal shares.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, setting aside the settlement deed and partitioning the property into four equal shares.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The deed was executed without considering the plaintiff's legal rights as a heir.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The deed was executed without considering the plaintiff's legal rights as a heir.
Supporting Evidence
The defendants have no case that the plaintiff is not the son of late Mr. Madhavan and Mrs. Nani couple and he is not a legal heir.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The settlement deed No. 670/2016 dated 01.08.2016 of Kavalayoor S.R.O is hereby set aside. 2. The plaint schedule property shall be divided into four equal shares.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ravi
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajani. S.
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashokan
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasi
Party Age
59
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Remani
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of partition deed No. 491/ 2011, Certified copy of settlement deed No. 670/ 2016, Passport of Ravi, S.S.L.C. book of Ravi.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Bilahari G. R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Shefin. N.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Kilimanoor. S. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Settlement deed No. 670/2016 of Kavalayoor S.R.O is hereby set aside.
Evidence:
It is interesting to note that DW1 has admitted the right of the plaintiff in the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaint schedule property shall be divided into four equal shares.
Evidence:
The plaint schedule property can be divided into four equal shares and additional plaintiff no.2 is entitled to get one such share.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Prayer for granting permanent prohibitory injunction is hereby dismissed.
Evidence:
So this court is of the view that the plaintiff failed to prove possession over the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of partition deed No. 491/ 2011 of S.R.O., Kavalayoor, dated 31/03/2011.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed No. 670/ 2016 dated 01/08/2016.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Passport of Ravi.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: SSLC Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
SSLC book of Ravi.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission Report submitted by the Adv. Commissioner Sri. Jobin P.S., dated 02/1/2018.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough sketch prepared by the Adv. Commissioner Sri. Jobin. P.S., dated 02/1/2018.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Right of way obstruction
Case Code
Case between Ravi vs Ashokan et al regarding declaration and consequential permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Ravi vs Ashokan et al regarding declaration and consequential permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Thu, 11/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Gasini et al vs Vaheeda Beevi regarding partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sulatha vs Reetha regarding default dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. S.R. Educational and Charitable Trust et al vs M/S Asset Reconstructions Company (India) Ltd. regarding withdrawal of suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Poorna Printing and Publishing House vs Pala Ninna Poika Residence Association et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won