Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 234/2022

Case between Sarala et al vs Jayaram regarding settlement of disputes

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-02-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Sarala and Lohithakshan are involved in a legal dispute with the defendant Jayaram. The parties have settled their disputes through out of court discussions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the joint compromise filed by the parties and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee if permissible as law
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the joint compromise filed by the parties and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The joint compromise terms are lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The parties have settled their disputes through out of court discussions. The court heard and perused the records including the joint compromise filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is decreed in terms of the joint compromise. The joint compromise will form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarala
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lohithakshan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayaram
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ottoor Biju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Semeen N. Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.. Haripriya S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Latheesh R. Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Babu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the joint compromise.
Evidence:
The court heard and perused the records including the joint compromise filed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sarala et al vs Jayaram regarding settlement of disputes
Case Code Year
Case between Sarala et al vs Jayaram regarding settlement of disputes

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nancy vs Reeja regarding rejection of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won