Original Suit No. 246/2008

Case between Muhammed Ilyas vs Safarulla et al regarding dismissal for default

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA

Judge

Sri. ARAVIND P.

Order Date

2025-06-03

Duration

Case Closed

Tue, 06/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Muhammed Ilyas and Thajudeen, while the defendants include Safarulla, Jameela, and Mariyam Beevi. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no steps were taken to adduce evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented.

Key Reasoning:
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to present evidence.

Why Defendant Won:
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to present evidence.

Supporting Evidence

The court stated that the plaintiff was absent and no steps taken to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Ilyas
Party Age: 70
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thajudeen
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Safarulla
Party Age: 49
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jameela
Party Age: 53
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mariyam Beevi
Party Age: 48
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. N. Gopalakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Saabir F. Haq
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit is dismissed for default due to no representation and no steps taken to adduce evidence.

Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification