Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 114/2025

Case between Maunudeen. M vs Shakir et al regarding encroachment and injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P
Order Date
2025-03-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Maunudeen. M as the plaintiff seeking an injunction against the defendants, Shakir and others, to prevent encroachment. The court found that a prima facie case was established.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an interim injunction to the plaintiff, preventing the defendants from encroaching on the petition schedule property. Irreparable injury would occur without this order.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction against encroachment
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an interim injunction to the plaintiff, preventing the defendants from encroaching on the petition schedule property. Irreparable injury would occur without this order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was established, and there was a risk of irreparable injury to the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case was established, and there was a risk of irreparable injury to the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Maunudeen. M
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shakir
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Azeez@ Shibu
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaji
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.P. Jayachandran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Respondents are restrained from encroaching into petition schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Maunudeen. M vs Shakir et al regarding encroachment and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Maunudeen. M vs Shakir et al regarding encroachment and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won