OS NO. 147/2025

Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA

Judge

Sri. ARAVIND. P

Order Date

2025-04-04

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anoop. P is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Lissy. P. S, the respondent. The court determined that a prima facie case was made out and granted a temporary injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Interim injunction granted against the respondent.

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondent from encroaching into the plaint schedule property.

Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case is made out and irreparable injury will be caused if the injunction is not granted.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondent is restrained from encroaching in to the plaint schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Anoop. P
Party Age: 41
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Lissy. P. S
Party Age: 62
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Jayakrishnan. S
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The respondent is restrained from encroaching in to the plaint schedule property and further restrained from committing any act of waste therein until further order.

Evidence:

If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification