Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS NO. 112/2025

Case between Rakeeb vs Rameesa et al regarding injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P
Order Date
2025-03-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rakeeb, the plaintiff, seeks an injunction against Rameesa and others, who are the defendants. The court finds that a prima facie case exists and that not granting the injunction would cause irreparable harm.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, preventing them from alienating or encumbering the petition property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction against the defendants, preventing them from alienating or encumbering the petition property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that a prima facie case was established and that delay in granting the injunction would lead to irreparable harm.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that a prima facie case was established and that delay in granting the injunction would lead to irreparable harm.
Supporting Evidence
The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the plaint, affidavit and documents produced. I am satisfied that, a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the very purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondents are restrained from alienating or encumbering the petition A schedule property until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rakeeb
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rameesa
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saheema
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabeela
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajitha
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naseeb
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Plaint, affidavit and documents produced by the petitioner.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ali Nafiyudeen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sara.B.Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondents are restrained from alienating or encumbering the petition A schedule property until further order.
Evidence:
If ad-interim injunction is not granted, irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rakeeb vs Rameesa et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Rakeeb vs Rameesa et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won