Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1350/2019

Case between SNDP Saka No.1068, Vattiyoorkavu et al vs Vilasini et al regarding Counter Claim

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-02-24
Duration
Case Code No.
1350
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a counter claim filed by SNDP Saka No.1068, Vattiyoorkavu against defendants Vilasini and Subhadra Rajan. The court dismissed the counter claim due to the absence of both parties and the lack of a chief affidavit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The counter claim was dismissed due to the absence of both the counter claim plaintiffs and defendants. No chief affidavit was filed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Counter Claim
Final Judgment
No
The counter claim was dismissed due to the absence of both the counter claim plaintiffs and defendants. No chief affidavit was filed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence counterclaim is dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on this the 24th day of February 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SNDP Saka No.1068, Vattiyoorkavu
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Babusen
Party Age
67
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Radhakrishnan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudharsanan
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vilasini
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subhadra Rajan
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.S. Sunil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.S.Mahesh Dev.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Jayachandran Nair.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Counterclaim was dismissed due to absence of both parties and lack of filed chief affidavit.
Evidence:
Hence counterclaim is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Counter Claim
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Anilkumar et al vs G.S. Deepa regarding declaration, fixation of boundary and consequential decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Counter Claim Plaintiff Won
Case between Reetha vs M.M. Hashim regarding counter claim.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Counter Claim Defendant Won
Case between Velukutty et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding Counter Claim
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Counter Claim Defendant Won
Case between Advaita Srikant vs Hilur M. Sainudeen regarding Counter Claim
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Counter Claim Defendant Won
Case between Ouseph @ Santhosh et al vs Stella Victo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Counter Claim Plaintiff Won