OS.No.1447/2008

Case between Velukutty et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding Counter Claim

Court

COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF

Judge

Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S

Order Date

2025-02-06

Duration

approximately-16 years 2 months 13 days

Case Code No.

1447

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a counter claim where Gopalakrishnan and others are opposing the claims made by the additional defendants. The counter claim was dismissed by the court due to the plaintiffs' absence in presenting evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The counter claim was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs did not present any evidence despite multiple opportunities given by the court.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Counter Claim

Final Judgment

The counter claim was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs did not present any evidence despite multiple opportunities given by the court.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs' failure to appear and provide evidence led to the dismissal of the counter claim.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs' failure to appear and provide evidence led to the dismissal of the counter claim.

Supporting Evidence

Despite receiving the FSL report on 16/12/2022, the counter claim plaintiff is not ready to adduce evidence till date.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the counter claim is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Gopalakrishnan
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jagadamma
Party Age: 72
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Syamala Kumari
Party Age: 56
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Radhakrishnan
Party Age: 56
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Chandrasekharan
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.N.R. Harikrishnan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The counter claim is dismissed for default due to the counter claim plaintiffs not being present for adducing evidence.

Evidence:

Hence, the counter claim is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification