Case Summary
Reetha, the counter claim plaintiff, is involved in a case against M.M. Hashim, the defendant. The claim was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Counter Claim
Final Judgment
No
The counter claim was dismissed as it was not pressed by the plaintiff. No order was made regarding costs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the counter claim is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reetha
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.M. Hashim
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.S. Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Rajeev. S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Counter claim dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the counter claim is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Counter Claim
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Reetha vs M.M. Hashim regarding counter claim.
Case Code Year
Case between Reetha vs M.M. Hashim regarding counter claim.