Case Summary
Advaita Srikant is the counter claim plaintiff and Hilur M. Sainudeen is the counter claim defendant. The court dismissed the counter claim as not pressed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Counter Claim
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the counter claim as not pressed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Not applicable
Not applicable
Why Defendant Won:
Not applicable
Not applicable
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the counter claim is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Advaita Srikant
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hilur M. Sainudeen
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vishnu Varma
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Preetha Rani. M.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Counter claim is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Defendant submitted that the counter claim is not pressed. Endorsement also made to that aspect. Hence, the counter claim is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Counter Claim
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023