Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
COUNTER CLAIM . No. 144/2018

Case between Baby Girija vs Gopalakrishnan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a counter claim for a permanent prohibitory injunction filed by Baby Girija against Gopalakrishnan. Baby Girija, a cancer patient, has been running a provision store but is facing threats from Gopalakrishnan to vacate the shop room.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court has dismissed the suit for default and decreed the counterclaim in favor of Gopalakrishnan, directing Baby Girija to vacate the premises and pay outstanding rent.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
The counterclaim defendant is directed to surrender the vacant possession of counterclaim schedule shop rooms to the counterclaim plaintiff within thirty days.
Case Type
Counter Claim
Final Judgment
No
The court has dismissed the suit for default and decreed the counterclaim in favor of Gopalakrishnan, directing Baby Girija to vacate the premises and pay outstanding rent.
Key Reasoning:
The counterclaim plaintiff established his case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Through the unchallenged oral and documentary evidence adduced by the counterclaim plaintiff/frst defendant, he has established his case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed for default. The counterclaim is decreed as follows: 1. The counterclaim defendant is directed to surrender the vacant possession of counterclaim schedule shop rooms to the counterclaim plaintiff within thirty days from the date of this decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baby Girija
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopalakrishnan
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent agreement dated 03.04.2017, Copy of Advocate Notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Vijayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff requested permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent eviction.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Counterclaim plaintiff entitled to recover arrears of rent.
Evidence:
The counterclaim plaintiff is entitled to realize `64,400/- (Rupees Sixty Four Thousand and Four Hundred only) from counterclaim defendant as arrears of rent.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Counterclaim defendant directed to surrender vacant possession of the shop rooms.
Evidence:
The counterclaim defendant is directed to surrender the vacant possession of counterclaim schedule shop rooms to the counterclaim plaintiff within thirty days from the date of this decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of rental agreement between the counterclaim plaintiff and defendant for the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice issued to the counterclaim defendant regarding the eviction.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Copy of License No. 46/2018/LE5/TEMP
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
License required for conducting business in the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Copy of Site plan
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Site plan for the counterclaim shop room.
Reference:
Ext.B3(a)
Document Type: Copy of inward No. 3626 dated 04-09-2018
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Inward register document related to the premises.
Reference:
Ext.B3(b)
Document Type: Copy of Form AE-5 (License for sale of fire Crackers)
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Licenses for conducting cracker business.
Reference:
Ext.B3(c) & Ext.B3(d)
Document Type: Copy of plan
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Plan document related to the premises.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Copy of License Form LE5
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
License for conducting business.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Copy of report No. 8494 of Tahsildar, Varkala
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Report related to the land from local authority.
Reference:
Ext.B5(l)
Document Type: Copy of Rent agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of rental agreement for the counterclaim shop room.
Reference:
Ext.B6(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Counter Claim
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Baby Girija vs Gopalakrishnan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Baby Girija vs Gopalakrishnan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Farooq vs Adnan et al regarding temporary injunction against eviction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Mohanan.B vs James Fletcher regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mini. G.S vs M/s NCS Auto Cars Private Limited regarding eviction for non-payment of rent.
Rent Control Court
Eviction Plaintiff Won
Case between Muthukrishnan Raman et al vs Mushroom Farmers and by products Producers Welfare Society et al regarding eviction of rental property
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Soumya.M.V vs Prime Leaders Trading and Services Private Limited regarding eviction for non-payment of rent.
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won