Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P.No.65/2024

Case between Soumya.M.V vs Prime Leaders Trading and Services Private Limited regarding eviction for non-payment of rent.

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-25
Duration
approximately-1 year 5 months
Case Code No.
65
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners Soumya.M.V and Saranya.M.V seek eviction of Prime Leaders Trading and Services Private Limited and its Managing Director Shylaja.A.J due to non-payment of rent since October 2023. The counter petitioners deny any arrears of rent, claiming the petition is premature.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition permitting the eviction of the counter petitioners due to their non-payment of rent. The counter petitioners are directed to pay arrears of rent along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of counter petitioners and payment of arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 18,00,000/-.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition permitting the eviction of the counter petitioners due to their non-payment of rent. The counter petitioners are directed to pay arrears of rent along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners proved their landlord-tenant relationship and the counter petitioners failed to dispute the arrears of rent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners proved their landlord-tenant relationship and the counter petitioners failed to dispute the arrears of rent.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioners had no case that they have remitted rent for the period of default alleged by the petitioners or had a case that even though the counter petitioners had paid rent, the petitioners had no issued any rent receipts.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed with costs directing the counter petitioners to pay arrears of rent of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) per month from October 2023 till March 2025 which amounts to Rs.18,00,000/- (Rupees Eighteen lakhs only) along with 6% interest per annum within one month from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Soumya.M.V
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saranya.M.V
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prime Leaders Trading and Services Private Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shylaja.A.J
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent deed dated 21.02.2023, Office copy of legal notice dated 22.05.2024, Postal receipts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Bindu.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.S.Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Nima Vinod
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdullah Asgar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners sought eviction of the counter petitioners from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
Considering the above analysis, it is found out that petition is allowable and petitioners are entitled for the arrears of rent as sought for.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioners sought the recovery of arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 18,00,000.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed with costs directing the counter petitioners to pay arrears of rent of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) per month from October 2023 till March 2025 which amounts to Rs.18,00,000/- (Rupees Eighteen lakhs only) along with 6% interest per annum.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It establishes the landlord-tenant relationship and terms of rent payment.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Office copy of the legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It serves as a formal notification to the counter petitioners regarding the rent default.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
They provide evidence of the sending of legal communications.
Reference:
Ext.A3 series
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It confirms receipt of the legal notice by the counter petitioners.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It indicates that the notice sent to the counter petitioners was not received successfully.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
R.C.P.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 10/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Dr. Radha Devi C.V. vs M/s. MAK and DEK regarding eviction and rent adjustment.
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vinod G.Pillai vs The White Food Makers & Restaurant et al regarding possession of property
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Muthukrishnan Raman et al vs Mushroom Farmers and by products Producers Welfare Society et al regarding eviction of rental property
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Vasantha kumari Padmakshy et al vs M/s.Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd et al regarding possession of the petition schedule building.
The Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Noorul Islamic Educational Trust(NIET) vs M/s Acumen Global Private Limited et al regarding a petition.
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won