Similar Cases
Based on: Final Decree Appln. 7/2023 in O.S. No. 131/2019 — Case between Athira Ajayan et al vs Sasidharan Pillai et al regarding petition for final decree
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS 160/2013
Case between Lissy vs Lilly et al regarding final decree application
Lissy, the plaintiff, filed a final decree application in an earlier civil suit for partition of property. The court has heard the petition and is finalizing the partition based on a commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 291/2015
Case between Swarnavalli et al vs Vishwaguptan et al regarding final decree application
The plaintiffs, Swarnavalli and others, filed an application for a final decree regarding the partition of property as per earlier orders. The court decided on the allotment of shares among the parties based on a commission report and survey plan.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 303/2020
Case between Soorya et al vs Sooraj regarding metes and bounds partition of property
This case involves a petition for passing a final decree regarding the partition of property among the plaintiffs and defendant. The plaintiffs are seeking to effectuate a division of the property as per a commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS 491/2016
Case between Suresh Kumar vs Sunilkumar K.K. et al regarding property partition
This case involves Suresh Kumar as the plaintiff and Sunilkumar K.K., Sujitha Bhai, and Sunitha as the defendants. They are involved in a property partition dispute regarding the allocation of shares in certain lands.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 307/2023
Case between Mini et al vs Robin regarding dismissal of petition
The case involves plaintiffs Mini, Renjini, and Jayini against defendant Robin regarding a petition that was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioners. The court noted repeated opportunities were provided to the petitioner to take necessary steps.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O. S. No. 248/2000
Case between Sathi vs Shalini Manilal regarding Final Decree Application
The petitioner, Sathi, and the respondent, Shalini Manilal, have settled their disputes through mediation. The court accepted the mediation agreement and passed a final decree according to its terms.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 448/2017
Case between Vysakh. S. Kumar vs Sandhya et al regarding Final Decree Application
The case involves Vysakh. S. Kumar as the petitioner against Sandhya and others regarding a final decree application. The court dismissed the application for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 341/2018
Case between Sudarsanan Pillai vs Sudharmini et al regarding Final Decree Application
Sudarsanan Pillai filed a final decree application against Sudharmini and others. The court dismissed the application for default due to failure to file the necessary commission application.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 409/2021
Case between Harikumar et al vs Sreekumar regarding metes and bounds partition
The plaintiffs, Harikumar, Sreekumari, and Bindhu, seek a final decree for partitioning property after a preliminary decree awarded them 3/4 share. The defendant, Sreekumar, remained absent and was set exparte during the proceedings.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.305/2010
Case between Philomina Rajan et al vs Joy Bai et al regarding passing of final decree
The petitioners, Philomina Rajan and Rajan, are seeking a final decree in a partition case. The respondents include Joy Bai and others, and the case involves allotting shares of property as per the commission report.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
O.S 223/2019
Case between Sindhu vs Binu regarding Final Decree Application
Sindhu is the petitioner and Binu is the respondent. The Final Decree application was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
OS.No.1085/2010
Case between Mini vs Jalaja kumari et al regarding Final Decree Application.
Mini is the petitioner seeking relief through a Final Decree Application, while Jalaja kumari and others are the defendants. The case was heard but the petitioner failed to appear, leading to the dismissal of the application.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
FDA 1351/2022
Case between Sunu S. vs Sumathi et al regarding partition of property
Sunu S. filed a petition for a final decree of partition of property following a preliminary decree. The defendants, Sumathi and others, did not appear in court.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
FDA.No. 1711/2022
Case between Xavier @ Suresh vs Valsan @ Banedict regarding partition of property
Xavier @ Suresh and Valsan @ Banedict are brothers involved in a legal dispute regarding the partition of their shared property. The court has passed a final decree regarding the division of the property into two equal shares.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
F.D.A No.4/2024
Case between Saranya Rajesh and Others vs Yashoda Mani @ Manju, Saran Mani regarding Final Decree Application dismissal
This case involves a Final Decree Application dismissal as not pressed by the court
Final Decree Application
O.S No. 539/2010
Case between Padmini vs Purushothaman et al regarding Final Decree Application.
Padmini filed a Final Decree Application against Purushothaman and others. The court dismissed the application as not pressed.
Final Decree Application
Defendant Won
OS.695/2021
Case between Sarojini.K.P et al vs Vikraman et al regarding partition of property.
The case involves a partition of property originally belonging to Chellappan. The plaintiffs and defendants, being children of Chellappan and Thankamma, sought to divide the inherited property following their parents' intestate deaths.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 24/2024
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
Babu Rajan N. and Raveendran Pillai are suing the Government of Kerala for a declaration of civil death of their brother, Mr. Rajendran N., who has been missing for 28 years. They require this declaration to facilitate obtaining a legal heirship certificate to pledge their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.41/2025
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
Sheena, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Anvar and Ramabhadran to stop an illegal chicken stall operating in a shop room owned by Ramabhadran. The plaintiff alleges threats and illegal constructions facilitated by Anvar.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 117/2021
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
The case involves The Federal Bank, Ltd represented by its Manager against defendants Siyad. S and Haseena Beevi. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.273/2022
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
The petitioners, children of the deceased Solomon Cruz, are seeking a declaration of title and possession over a property purchased by their father, while the defendants claim rights over a portion of the property. The case involves disputes over property tax and land boundaries.
Civil Suit
OS No. 361/2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
Sunitha, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant, to prevent alleged encroachment on her property. The dispute arises from a badminton court construction agreement and ownership claims over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 361/ 2024
Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction
Sunitha, the plaintiff, filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Shibu Purushothaman, the defendant. The case involves a dispute over property rights and the construction of a badminton court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 43/2025
Case between Nithin Krishna vs Gireesh et al regarding suit dismissal
Nithin Krishna is the plaintiff, and Gireesh along with others are the defendants in this case. The plaintiff filed a memo of not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 156/ 2025
Case between A. Shahjahan et al vs Shaji et al regarding injunction
The case involves A. Shahjahan and others as plaintiffs against Shaji and Krishna Kumar regarding a petition for an injunction related to property encroachment. The court finds that a prima facie case exists for granting an interim injunction to prevent irreparable injury to the plaintiffs.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 229/2021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The case involves Ayisha Beevi as the plaintiff, represented by her son Navas, against defendants Noushad and Shajahan. The court is hearing a petition regarding an injunction to prevent the defendants from alienating certain property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 229/22021
Case between Ayisha Beevi vs Noushad regarding injunction on property.
The plaintiffs, Ayisha Beevi and her son Navas, are seeking to prevent the defendants, Noushad and Shajahan, from alienating a property. The court has issued an interim order to maintain the status quo until a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 147/2025
Case between Anoop. P vs Lissy. P. S regarding injunction
Anoop. P is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Lissy. P. S, the respondent. The court determined that a prima facie case was made out and granted a temporary injunction.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 219/ 2024
Case between Resmi vs Sureshkumar et al regarding temporary injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Resmi, the petitioner, is seeking a temporary injunction against her father Sureshkumar and his siblings, who are allegedly trying to alienate property against her father's interest. The petitioner claims her father is vulnerable due to his health conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 14/2022
Case between Thankamma Amma et al vs The State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of civil death.
The plaintiffs are the close relatives of Mr. Suresh Babu, who has been missing since 15.08.1990. They seek a declaration of his civil death to facilitate legal proceedings regarding his estate.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 79/2025
Case between Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust et al vs Raju et al regarding election to the director board of first petitioner trust
This case involves a petition by Mambashakonam Kadiyathi Sri. Appooppan Ammoomma Kshethram Trust and others against Raju and others regarding preventing the election to the director board of the trust. The defendants were restrained from interfering with the election process until the suit is disposed of.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 179/2024
Case between Nahas vs Sabansa et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Nahas filed a suit against Sabansa and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed after the petitioner’s counsel submitted a memo indicating no further pursuit of the action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 340/2024
Case between Mahesh Lal vs Salimkuty et al regarding dismissal of the suit.
Mahesh Lal filed a suit against Salimkuty and Sachin S. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP.No 15/2024 IN OS No. 59//2008
Case between Udha vs Chandramgathan et al regarding execution of decree.
The plaintiffs, Udha and a deceased party Ponnamma, are executing a decree against the defendants, which include Chandramgathan and his legal heirs. The court found that the execution petition has been satisfied.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 137/2025
Case between Reenamony vs Remany, Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju regarding injunction
Reenamony is the petitioner seeking protection against the defendants Remany and Govinda Raj Ben @ Biju. The case involves a request for an interim injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 72/2025
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
The plaintiffs, led by Shahida Beevi, and defendants, led by Nahas, settled their disputes through out-of-court discussions. The joint compromise was accepted by the court, leading to the decree.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 150/2016
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
Rajesh and Sheeja are the plaintiffs, while Sofiya and Bijeer are the defendants. The case involved a dispute that was settled through out-of-court discussions, leading to a joint compromise.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Sobhana et al regarding temporary injunction for construction
The plaintiffs are seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from constructing on a property that the plaintiffs claim. The dispute involves allegations of encroachment and ownership over adjacent properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 40/2019
Case between Sarasamma et al vs Shobhana et al regarding IA. 01/2024
The petitioners, including Sarasamma, Prasobha, and Velayudhan, are involved in a case against the respondents, Shobhana and Pradeep, regarding an interim application. The court has allowed the petition and appointed an advocate commissioner for inspection.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.136/2025
Case between Vijayamma vs Anu et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Vijayamma filed a petition seeking an ad-interim injunction against Anu and others. The court found that failure to grant the injunction could cause irreparable injury to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO. 132/ 2025
Case between Kannan vs Anoob. V.R. regarding injunction
Kannan is the petitioner seeking an injunction against Anoob. V.R. The court determined that granting the injunction is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 166/2019
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
Thulaseedharan, the plaintiff, has died, and no legal heirs have taken steps to continue the case. As a result, the court decided to abate the suit.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 167/2019
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
Shine is the plaintiff and Thulaseedharan is the defendant. The court has abated the suit due to the death of the defendant and the lack of actions taken to implead the legal heir.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 403/2019
Case between Anilkumar vs Bindhu regarding execution petition
Anilkumar is the decree holder in this execution petition against Bindhu, the judgment debtor. The court dismissed the execution petition as default due to the absence of the decree holder during the proceedings.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
OS NO. 131/2025
Case between R. Snehalatha vs Sarachandra Babu regarding injunction
R. Snehalatha filed a petition against Sarachandra Babu seeking an injunction to prevent interference with her water access. The court determined that granting the injunction was necessary to avoid irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 126/2025
Case between Anilal et al vs Harilal regarding injunction
Anilal, Vonodlal, Prameela, and Hema are the petitioners seeking an injunction against the respondent Harilal regarding certain properties. The court granted a temporary injunction to prevent any encumbrance or alienation of the schedule properties.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 127/2025
Case between Abhijith et al vs Mohandas regarding injunction against encroachment
The petitioners, Abhijith and Jalajakumari Amma, are seeking an injunction against the defendant, Mohandas, regarding the encroachment of property. The court found that failure to grant the injunction would cause irreparable injury to the petitioners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS NO.128/2025
Case between Arya.G vs Deepthi Sinha regarding injunction
Arya.G, the plaintiff, is seeking an injunction against Deepthi Sinha, the defendant, to prevent encroachment on her property. The court has found a prima facie case for the injunction.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won