Case Summary
The petitioner, Sathi, and the respondent, Shalini Manilal, have settled their disputes through mediation. The court accepted the mediation agreement and passed a final decree according to its terms.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Final Judgment
No
The final decree was passed based on the mediation agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
The court accepted the mediation agreement since the terms are lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the final decree is passed as follows: 1. The plot ABCFGHIA is allotted to petitioner as per the Ext. C1(a)-plan. 2. The plot CDEFC is allotted to the respondent as per Ext. C1 (a) plan.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sathi
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shalini Manilal
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation agreement, Ext. C1 (a) plan
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Joy Bhaskar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree passed as per the terms of the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
The court heard and perused the records included in the mediation agreement.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Mediation Agreement
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms agreed upon by both parties during mediation, which the court accepted.
Reference:
Ext. C1 (a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Final Decree Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sathi vs Shalini Manilal regarding Final Decree Application
Case Code Year
Case between Sathi vs Shalini Manilal regarding Final Decree Application
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement